Releasing frequently requires repeatable confidence that changes are safe. Reliably verifying system health requires covering the many failure modes of a system. So, what are those failure modes?
Tighten the Net
Software can fail in innumerable ways. It’s impossible and impractical to cover every kind of failure on every system.
Fortunately, we don’t have to. The test suite can be tailored to each application even without up-front understanding of the key failure modes for that application.
Every system has expected behaviors. We have to know at least some of these to write the system. Start by encoding those as automated tests. Then, add automated tests for any errors that slip past those tests. This will iteratively reduce the kinds of errors that can slip past tests and into production. It also intrinsically focuses effort on the most probable errors for each individual system.
This approach is called tighten the net.
Enumerating Failure Modes
Tightening the net is a very practical technique which doesn’t require foresight about every kind of failure we might encounter. Still, I want to have a good mental map of errors types to better reason about system quality.
Here’s an attempt at enumerating major categories of system failure
- Incorrect implementations
- misunderstanding requirements
- code doesn’t match developer’s intent
- syntax errors
- sneaky violations of assumptions about system state
- concurrency / timing issues
- insufficient defensive programming (i.e. breaks on unexpected values)
- Integration issues
- misaligned contract expectations
- breaking changes (shape or behavior)
- coordinated update issues
- coupled uptime
- Experiential failures
- broken UI elements
- latency / slow interaction
- Performance failures
- high latency
- Infrastructure failures
- network failures
- catestrophic failures (i.e. hardware dies)
- insufficient resources (drive space, memory, etc)
- random failures (i.e. bit flips)
- Malicious / Security
- injection attacks
- guessing resource locations for unauthorized access
- This rabbit hole goes deep. Check OWASP for common exploits
SWEBOK Testing Types
The Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK) doesn’t appear to explicitly enumerate fault types, but it does enumerate types of testing (Chapter 4 section 2).
- Unit tests
- Integration tests
- System tests
- Acceptance tests
- Installation tests
- Alpha and Beta tests
- Reliability Achievement and Evaluation tests (e.g. operational profile)
- Regression tests
- Performance tests
- Security tests
- Stress tests
- Back-to-back tests (test two versions of the system for consistent results)
- Recovery tests
- Interface tests (check contracts between components)
- Configuration tests
- Usability tests
These test type rather satisfactorily align with the failure types, which gives me some confidence that the failure list is reasonably representative.